Pazar, Temmuz 28

ALLAH hayrını dilediği kişiyi sıkıntıya sokar

Resûlullah sallallahu aleyhi ve sellem şöyle buyurdu:

“ALLAH hayrını dilediği kişiyi sıkıntıya sokar.”

Açıklama: Hadisimiz, başa gelen sıkıntıların bazan lutuf ve hayır vesilesi olacağını açıkça ortaya koymaktadır. Burada söz konusu olan belâ ve musibetlerin neler olabileceğini ise, Bakara sûresi’nin 155. âyeti açıklamıştır. ALLAH Teâlâ şöyle buyurmuştur:
... “..Sizi biraz korku, biraz açlık ve mallardan, canlardan, ürünlerden eksiltmekle sınarız. Sabredenleri müjdele!”
Önceki iki hadiste de görüldüğü gibi belâ ve musîbetler, sabır gösterilirse ya günahların bağışlanmasına ya da, burada işâret edildiği üzere, hayır ve ecirlere vesile olur. Nitekim İmam Gazzâlî, konuya üç ayrı yorum getirmiştir:
1. Münafığın başına gelen musîbet ve hastalıklar. Münafık, sıkıntıya sabretmeyip şikâyette bulunduğu için bunlar onun hakkında tam bir cezâ anlamı taşır.
2. Mü’minin hastalık ve musîbeti. Mü’min, bunların ALLAH’dan geldiği bilinci içinde sabreder. Böylece de sıkıntıları günahlarına kefâret olur.
3. Şükür ve rızâ halindeki olgun mü’minlerin hastalık ve sıkıntıları. Bunlar belâ ve musîbet halinde de ALLAH’a hamd ve şükür görevlerini yerine getirirler. Öylece onların sıkıntıları, ALLAH katındaki derecelerinin yükselmesine vesile olur.
Netice olarak şunu unutmamak gerekir ki, bu dünya imtihan dünyasıdır. ALLAH katında derece sahibi olmanın bir yolu da belâ ve musîbetlere uğramaktan geçmektedir. Bu durumda yapılacak iş, başa her ne gelmişse, onu sabır ve rızâ ile karşılamaktır. Müslümanın asıl kazancı buradadır. Bir anlamda sabır, müslüman için, her olumsuzluğu lehine çevirmeye imkân vermektedir.
Hadisten Öğrendiklerimiz
1. Başa gelen her belâ ve sıkıntı, mutlaka bir cezâ değildir.
2. Müslüman belâ ve musibetlere sabretmek suretiyle ALLAH katındaki derecesini yükseltebilir.

Hadis-i Şerif'in Kaynağı: (Buhârî, Merdâ 1.)
Rivayet Eden: Ebû Hüreyre radıyallahu anh
Riyazü's Salihin - İmam Nevevi Tercüme ve Şerh: Prof. Dr. M. Yaşar Kandemir, Prof. Dr. İsmail Lütfi Çakan, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Raşit Küçük

Yoruldum, bunaldım, boğuluyorum. Çaresizim. Ne yapmalıyım?”

"-Yoruldum, bunaldım, boğuluyorum. Çaresizim. Ne yapmalıyım?”

“-Öncelikle ‘Allah kimseye kaldıramayacağı sorumluluğu yüklemez. Herkesin yaptığı iyilik kendi yararına ve yaptığı kötülük de kendi zararınadır.’ (Bakara, 286) Eğer siz hayatın ağırlığı altında gerçekten de eziliyorsanız, kaldıramadığınız yükü kendiniz omuzlamış olmalısınız. Hayatın dev dalgalarıyla çarpışmayın barıkan geliyorlarsa üzerinizden geçsinler. Gökkubbeyi ayakta tutmaya zorlamayın; Allah onu tutacaksa duracak, tutmayacaksa sizin gücünüz yetmez. Elimizden geleni yapıp tevekkül etmeye mahkumuz.

Acı bir derdiniz varsa mümkünse onu hayatınızdan uzaklaştırırsınız; bunu yapamıyorsanız, onun kalbinizdeki acısını azaltırsınız. Neyi düzeltebileceğinizi bilmek ve neye ne kadar duyarlı olacağınızı belirlemek sizin işinizdir.
...
Bir günah mı işlediniz? Yürekten tövbe edip acısını eritmenize engel mi var? Bir hak mı yediniz? İade edebilir veya helalleşebilirsiniz. Eşinizden işkence mi görüyorsunuz, ayrılma riskini göze alabilirsiniz. Anne-babanızın ayıbından mı utanıyorsunuz? Başkasının günahından sorumlu değilsiniz. Bugün hakkınızı arayamıyor musunuz? Her şey değişir. Aciz bir yaşlıya hizmet etmek mi ağır geliyor? Hem hizmeti ölüm bitirecek ve hem de hizmetin sevabı çok büyük. Sabır kimin için? El âlem ne mi der? El âlemin ağzı çuval değil ki büzesin. Hayatı el âlem için yaşamıyoruz ki. Kazanırsak kıskanıyorlar, kaybedersek kahrediyorlar.

Asıl ‘Allah ne der?’ demeli değil mi? Şeklinizle, suretinizle mi kavgalısınız? Sonumuz toprak olmayacak mı zaten? Poy pos mu kalacak ki? Geleceğinizden mi endişeleniyorsunuz? Kimin yarınının hayatı garanti ki? Ayrıca hayatı Allah yönetmiyor mu? Allah’ın planından endişelenmek niye?” Dr. Muhammed Bozdağ

Cumartesi, Temmuz 27

Neden Sufizm?

Muhyiddin İbn Arabi Füsus ül Hikem’de insanın bu yaşamdaki amacının “gadap” halinden kurtulup “rahmet” haline erişmek olduğunu söyler.. Yani kişisel gelişim ve dönüşüm süreci bu bağlamda kalpteki “küfür”ün temizlenmesi ve “iman”ın kalbe yerleşmesidir. Şehvet, şiddet ve korku gibi olumsuz kayıtlardan kurtulup sevgi, şiddetsizlik ve güveni yaşamaktır. Böylece insan kalıcı bir dönüşüm geçirmekte ve “mümin” olmaktadır. Bu perspektifte, insanın asıl kimliği “mümin” niteliğiyle belirtilmektedir. Hakiki imanın göstergesi de budur. Bu seviyeye erişmiş olmaktır. Bu aynı zamanda Tasavvufun temel dönüşüm dizgesinin dördüncü seviyesidir. Yani Nefsi Mutmainne. Tatmin olmuş nefs, Huzura ermiş nefs. Bu aynı zamanda Sekinet’in ya da Rahmanî Nefes’in kalbe yerleşmesi olarak da ele alınır. Hint sisteminde Kundali’nin (Rahmani Nefes’in Hint’teki karşılığı olan Adi Shakti’nin insandaki hali) insanın dördüncü şakrasına, yani kalp şakrasına yerleşmesi olarak ele alınır. Bunun öncesinde ise Tasavvufta Nefsi Mülhime vardır. Yani, ilhamlar alan, sezgileri çalışan nefs, Hint’te üçüncü şakranın açılması ve kundalinin bu şakrayı kaplaması olarak geçer. İnsanın ilhamlar almaya başladığı söylenir. Yedinci seviye Nefsi Kamile ya da Nefsi Safiye ya da Nefsi Envare yani tenevvür etmiş, Aydınlanmış Nefs’tir. Hint’teki karşılığı başımızın üst kısmındaki Sahasrara şakrasının açılması ve kundalinin buraya yerleşmesidir. Kişi başkalarını “doğru olarak algılamaya” başlar. Algı filtreleri ya da Ahlâk boyaları temizlenmiştir. Kalb aynası parlamaktadır. Kristal Aynada her şey “algı filtrelerinin ve egonun çarpıtmaları olmadan” aksetmektedir. Açıklık, Gözlem, Farkındalık, Bilgelik ve Zeka boyutudur. Tasavvufta bu zeka boyutu, “Zeka tezkiye edilmiş akıldır” sözüyle belirtilir. Yedili dizgeyi birlikte ele alırsak nefs-i emmare (kötülüğün etkisi altındaki nefs), nefs-i levvame (kendini eleştiren nefs), nefs-i mülhime (sezgileri çalışan nefs), nefs-i mutmainne (tatmin olmuş nefs), nefs-i raziye (insanlardan razı olan nefs), nefs-i marziye (insanların kendisinden razı oldukları nefs, NLP’deki Liderlik için bu seviye çalışmaları gereklidir!) ve nefs-i envare (aydınlanmış, tenevvür etmiş, ışık yayan nefs).
Bu yazı bağlamında ele alacağımız Kişilik Ötesi Sufî Perspektifi üç evreye sahiptir:
İlim ve İrfaniyet, Aşk (Allah Aşkı) ve Yokluk (Fenafillah).
Bu evrelerin tarihsel süreç içindeki örnekleri ise şöyledir:
İlim ve irfaniyet evresi için Muhyiddin İbn Arabi;
Aşk evresi için Yunus Emre ve Mevlânâ Celâleddin Rumî;
Yokluk evresi için İsmail Emre.
Aydınlanma arayışı içinde olan bir insanın manevî gelişim sürecinde bu aşamalardan geçtiği söylenebilir. Bu ilerleyiş bir dizi olarak değil, bir dizge olarak ele alınmalıdır. Karşılıklı ilişki içinde ele alınmalıdır. Kişinin geçtiği aşamalar her zaman bu sırada olmak zorunda değildir tabi ki. Yaşam üslubu ya da hayat şekilleri de etkili olmaktadır. Emre şöyle demektedir:
 “Kin, kibir, hased, şehvet, riya, gadap, yalan insandan kalkmalı ve şehvetsiz, menfaatsiz bir sevgi insana yerleşmeli”.
İsmail Emre’nin bir sözü yokluk noktasına ışık tutmaktadır:
“Hiçbir arzum ve düşüncem yok, sırf hizmetçilik ve sevgi.”
Bu söz, arzuların etkisi altındaki nefs’in (Freud’un alanı) ve düşüncelerin etkisi altındaki nefs’in (Descartes’in alanı) aşıldığı bir ruhsal boyutu işaret etmektedir. Freud ve Descartes gözlüğüyle bakan Batılıların anlamakta zorlanacağı bir boyuttur. Beden ve akıl gözlerini aşan kontamplasyon ya da keşf gözüyle (Bonaventura, Ken Wilber) aradıkları boyuttur bu.
Kabir Helminski, “Bilen Kalp-Ruhsal Dönüşümün Sufi Yolu” adlı kitabında şöyle yazmakta:
Temel soru, çeşitli biçimlerde ortaya konabilir: Bireysel insan bilinci ile ne yapmaktayız? Ego’yu geliştirmeli miyiz, yoksa onu yok mu etmeliyiz? Bireysel benliğin daha büyük gerçeklikle olan doğru ilişkisi nedir? Benliğin uygun ve gerçek sınırları nelerdir? Manevi bir psikoloji, her şeyin üstünde, nitelikler ve değerler ile ilgili bir psikolojidir. Manevi nitelik ve değerleri nasıl harekete geçirebiliriz?
Bu konuyu, gerçekten holistik (bütüncül) ve Transpersonal (Kişilik Ötesi) bir bağlam içinde nasıl yeni bir biçimde ifade edebiliriz?
Eğer Varoluşçu olsaydık, evrenin saçma olduğunu, ama insanların yine de yaşamak için belirli değerleri seçebileceğini söyleyebilirdik. Transpersonal Sufi perspektifi açısından ise, bu değerlerin sadece bireysel beyinler tarafından bir anlam ve düzen oluşturmak için harcanan umutsuz bir çaba olarak üretilmediğini sanırım ki çoğumuz kabul edecektir. Bunlar, daha çok gerçekliğin esasına ait niteliklerdir. Gerçeklik temelde iyidir.
Şarlatan Ruhsal Ustalar ya da Bogus Masters
Hemen hemen her kavramın yozlaştırdığı ve içinin boşaltıldığı günümüzde, meditasyon kelimesi de aynı akibetten kurtulamamıştır. Marco Pallis’in deyişiyle “Dünyanın her yerinde Şarlatan Ruhsal Ustaları (Bogus Masters) kolayca bulabilirsiniz.
Tasavvuf Tarihimizde Meditasyon
Tasavvuf tarihimizde meditasyon, kontamplasyon, huzur, sakinlik gibi deneyimler yok mu? Bunlar bizim için sadece yabancıların deneyimlediği ve yazdığı, bizim de tercümelerle, kurslarla hakkında bilgi edindiğimiz şeyler mi? Acaba?
Muhyiddin İbn Arabi’den derlenmiş Endülüs Sufileri kitabından bir alıntıya dönelim şimdi:
YEDİLER. Onlarla Mekke’de karşılaştım ve Allah, tüm Müslümanları onlardan yararlandırsın dilerim. Hanhalit duvarı ile Zemzem arasındaki bir yerde onlarla birlikte oturdum. Gerçekten de Allah tarafından seçilmiş kişilerdi. Öylesine bir Kutsal Huzur (haly tranquility – sakinah) ve huşu içindeydiler ki, gözlerini bile kırpmıyorlardı. Onlarla karşılaştığım zaman Derin Bir Düşünce Hali (in a state of contemplation) içindeydiler. Ben ve Onlar arasında herhangi bir konu hakkında hiçbir sözcük konuşulmadı. Onları, Düşünülmesi Bile Olanaksız Derin Bir Dinginlik (unimaginable calm) içinde gördüm.
Bilgelik, aydınlanma, keşf, kontamplasyon, meditasyon, huzur, sakinlik gibi kavramlar şu ya da bu millete, şu ya da bu dile, şu ya da bu Yol’a ait, ona özgü mülkler değildirler. Ne Doğu’ya ne de Batı’ya aittirler. Bunlar hepimizin malıdır. Nerede bulursak almalıyız. Tabi dikkatli olmalıyız. Yukarıda geçen Bogus Masters her dinde, her millete, her Yol’da, her kişisel Gelişim Kursunda karşımıza çıkabilir.
Sharon Labell’in çağdaş bir Epiktetos yorumu olan “İçsel Huzur İyi Yaşamın Kapısını Açar” kitabında M.Ö. beşyüz yıllarında bilgelik ya da hikmet üzerine söylenmiş şu sözlere kulak verelim biraz:
- Bilgelik edimlerinizle/ fiillerinizle açığa çıkar, konuşmalarınızla değil.
“Bilgeliği doğrudan yaşamak onun hakkında bir şeyler bilmekten daha önemlidir.”
“İdeallerinizi yaşamaya başlayın.”
John White’ın kendi yazılarından ve başka yazarlardan ve başka yazarlardan yaptığı derlemelerden oluşan “Aydınlanma Nedir? İç Dünyanın Keşfi” adlı kitabında White, “Aydınlanma için Adlar ve Simgeler” başlıklı bölümde şunlar yazar:
“Aydınlanmaya pek çok ad verilmiştir. Buda ‘aydınlanmış kişi’ anlamına gelir, Christ ve Mesih de öyle. Aziz Paul aydınlanmayı ‘Tanrının anlayışı aşan huzuru’, Richard Bucle ise ‘Kozmik Bilinç’ olarak adlandırdı. Zen’de adı ‘Satori’, Taoculukta ‘Wu’ ya da en son Tao’dur. Gürcüyef ona ‘Nesnel Blinç’ adını taktı. Sri Aurobindo ‘üstün zihin’den söz etti. Mistik okullar ve okült yollar ‘Aydınlanma’dan, ‘Özgürleşme’den ve ‘Kendini gerçekleştirme’den söz ettiler. Benzer olarak Aydınlanma birçok imgeleriyle de simgelenmiştir. Hinduizmin bir taş yapraklı Lotüs çiçeği (Nilüfer), Hıristiyanlığın Kutsal Kasesi, Budizmin Kristal Aynası, Yahudiliğin Davud Yıldızı, Taoculuğun Ying Yang Çemberi gibi. Ayrıca Dağın Doruğu, Kuğu, Dingin Göl, Gizemli Gül, Ebedî Alev.”
Transpersonal ya da Kişilik Ötesi Psikoloji konusunda en önemli eser Rouger Walsh ve Frances Vaughan’ın yazılarından ve derlemelerinden oluşan “Ego Ötesi”-(*) adlı kitaptır. Kitapta yer alan Ken Wilber’in “Bilim ve Transpersonal Psikoloji” başlıklı yazısında, Bonaventure’nın açıkladığı üç tür göz’den söz edilmektedir: “Beden Gözü”, “Akın Gözü” ve “Keşf Gözü” (eye of contemplation). Ken Wilber geleneksel olarak Batı Biliminin ve Felsefesinin sadece ilk iki görme biçimini kullandığını, “kontemplatif bilgeliği” ya da “keşf bilgeliği”ni ise  ya görmezden geldiği ya da diğer iki alana indirgediği için kategorik bir hata yaptığını, bu yüzden suçlu olduğunu söyler. Kişilik Ötesi Psikoloji’ye göre bilginin üç alanı vardır: “Duyumsal, deneyimsel”, “Kavramsal, akılsal” ve “Kontemplatif, meditatif.” Kendiliğin (self) ve gerçekliğin (reality) temel doğası içinde yapılan keşfler, kontamplasyon ve meditasyon yoluyla sağlanır. Bunlar üzerinde akılsal çalışmalarla kurumsal yorumlar yapılır ve sonuçlar çıkarılır. Bunlar da olanaklı olduğu ölçüde deneyimsel çalışmalarla temellendirilir, test edilir.
NLP ve Covey’de İnsan Kavramı
Dolayısıyla Kişilik Ötesi Psikoloji çalışmaları Batı’daki “insan” kavramını Doğu’nun insan anlayışıyla genişletmektedir. Sufizm, Budizm, Meditasyon çalışmaları incelenmekte, raporlaştırılmakta, uygulanmakta ve tekrar raporlaştırılmaktadır. NLP ve Stephen Covey de bunlardan yararlanmaktadır. Dolayısıyla “Meditasyon” ve “Kontamplasyon”, sezgi ya da keşf alanıyla bağlantılıdır. Bazı meditasyon okulları Konsantrasyon uygulamasıyla dikkati bir isim, dua, nesne, mum alevi üzerinde yoğunlaştırmayı uygular. Bazıları ise Sezgi uygulamasıyla dikkatlerini serbest bırakırlar. Bir köşede bağdaş kurarak oturup mantraları tekrar etmek ya da bazı hareketler için vücudu zorlamak yolun sonu değildir. Yolun sonu beden olarak insan olduğumuz gibi düşünce, söz ve davranışlarımızla da insan olmamızdır.
Hakikatin seyranına Krishnamurti Farkındalık” der, bunun “Düşünme”den çok farklı olduğunu belirtir. Mevlânâ’nın “Söz bakışı bulandırır” sözü tam da buraya uygundur. Söz ya da akıl, bakışı ya da keşfi, kontamplasyonu, farkındalığı bulandırır.
İsmail Emre, “Fiilini değiştir, duysun kulağın” demişti. Bu söz, NLP’nin de Covey’in de hedeflerini onlardan daha açık bir dille ifade edebilmektedir. NLP ve Covey’de algı filtreleri ve tutumlarda değişiklik yapılarak kişilerin fiilleri ve davranışları değiştirilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Bu ifadede ise önce fiiller üzerinde çalışmak esas alınmaktadır. “Bana fiillerinizle döneceksiniz!” sözünü de anımsayabiliriz bu noktada. Stephen Covey, karakterde gerçekleştirilecek bir değişim ve gelişimi, kişilikte yapılan geçici değişikliklerden üstün tutmaktadır. Bu bağlamda NLP’den üstün olduğu söylenebilir.
Kişisel gelişim ve dönüşüm, senin yaşam üslubunun ya da hayat şeklinin aynı kalacağı ve senin artı olarak bir şeyler kazanacağın bir kurs değildir.
Sen değişeceksin. Sen gelişeceksin. Sen dönüşeceksin.
Buna razı mısın?
Transpersonal Sufi Perspektifi adlı bu yazıyı, sizin için seçtiğim modellerden birisi olan Muhyiddin İhya’nın bir sözüyle bitirelim:
Ruhum imam, bedenim mescid; fiillerim, amellerim cemaatimdir!

The Eleven Hijabaat (Veils) of Sufism

Shaikh Hakim Chishti

"From among the multitude, Allah gracious appoints some selected persons as His friends to preach His commandments for the benefit of the world. Their one greatest qualification is that they renounce the wealth and pleasures of the world and dedicate their lives to the love, devotion and service of Allah and humanity. When others fear, they don't. And when others feel the pinch of sorrows and pain, they don't. When the world would have no such Walis then the Day-of-Qayamat would dawn upon it."

--Hazrat Ali Hujwari Data Ganj Baksh of Lahore
 The basic concept of Sufism is quite simple: that humans were created by a Supreme Creator (Allah) Who sent to His humanity over the course of time a succession of Prophets (a.s.) who revealed to this humanity the rules of life and conduct for living not only a harmonious life on this earth, but also for securing salvation in the next world.
In practical terms, the method of living out this life is reposited in the life example of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (s.a.s.) the final Prophet, who was sent to correct errors that had crept into the Divine Code revealed by prior Prophets (a.s.), and also to complete the Divine Revelation to humanity. Thus, the mission of all previous Prophets (a.s.) is accepted and respected, yet the Sufis follow the example of the final prophet, since it is conveyed by a book which is errorless, and deemed as Final by the Creator, the One who Sent it.
It would have been possible, easy even, for Allah to have left His Qur’an laying somewhere for everyone to find it. Yet, He, in His Wisdom, chose to have a human being first convey the Book, and then demonstrate and comment on each and every action ordained in the Qur’an. There is no comparable book or sequence of events associated with any other human in history.
The scope of life outlined in the Holy Qur’an is at once immensely practical and utterly sublime. Instead of each person making up their own mind, or interpreting according to their own whim or wish, we have a book of advices and codes which cannot possibly be arrived at by individual thought, choice or action.
In order to correctly implement the life outlined in the Holy Qur’an, it is the practice of Muslims to "imitate" the behaviors of the Holy Prophet (s.a.s.w.) . Yet, there are many verses and topics of the Qur’an which require deep thought and guidance for one to avoid being misled by one’s own interpretation and imagination.
Moreover, there are spiritual states alluded to in the Qur’an, which, in order to correctly understand or perform, Allah subhanu wa ta’ala advises us to consult with various persons whom He identifies as "possessing Knowledge," or "beloved friends," and similar descriptions. In sum, He grants that some are better or clearer than others in their understanding of His intentions for humanity.
It is in the foregoing context that the Sufi Orders arose --- not for the sake of evading or corrupting the Divine Commandments for humanity, but to methodically study and implement the Divine Codes to the highest degree possible in human beings.
According to the Chishti Sufi conception, there are eleven Hijabaat (veils) intervening between man and Allah, barriers to either fully implementing His Commands, or to fully experiencing the Light and Mercy which He has Promised.
The curriculum of the Chishti Order is designed to be carried out in a "teacher-student" context. While the course of study and practice ordinarily carries on for an extended period of up to 25 or 30 years, below we summarize the "veils" or barriers to true knowledge and understanding, which the instruction of the Shaikh aims to dissolve. In sum, Sufism is nothing but the heart and soul of Islam, expressed in a conceptual framework.
The Eleven Veils


(1) Ma’arifat (Knowledge of Allah)
The first Hijaab or veil is the veil of Allah's Ma’arifat, the Divine Knowledge pertaining to the relation of Allah with man.
Certain critics say that Ma’arifat is attained by ilm (knowledge) and aql (wisdom), but Shaikh Ali Hujwari refutes this claim. He says: "If Ma’arifat were attainable by ilm and aql then every alim (learned scholar) and wiser person should have been an Aarif (Sufi faqeer) whose definition and life are absolutely different from the definition and life of the Ulema (learned scholars). But it is not the case." He says "Ma’arifat is attained only by that aspirant who receives special favour or Hidayat of Allah because it is Allah alone Who opens, closes, widens or seals the door of an aspirant's heart. Ilm and Aql (knowledge and wisdom) can be helpful in attaining Ma’arifat but they cannot be its cause which is created only by the favour of Allah." "I have recognized Allah only through Himself and all else through His Light."
"What is Ma’arifat then?" asks Hazrat Ali Hujwari. He discusses the answer to this question in the light of the matured experiences of the great Sufis of the world:
Hazrat Abdullah-bin-Mubarik says : "Ma’arifat means that there should be no wonderment about anything of the world because this wonderment is created by Allah and is an act which is beyond all human conception, wisdom and powers. Because Allah Almighty has full control and command over everything of both the worlds then why should an Aarif (Sufi) entertain doubts or wonder about the powers and actions of Allah? They are as sure as daylight."
According to Hazrat Zunnoon Misri, "the reality of Ma’arifat is that Allah, by the persistent effulgence of His divine light, divulges His secrets to the Aarif and illumines his heart and eyes by this Light to protect him against all the evils of the world without permitting even an iota of any doubts or reflection in the heart of the Aarif. After acquiring this stage in Ma’arifat a Sufi continues to see and enjoy all the manifestations of Divine Secrets."
Hazrat Shibli says that Ma’arifat is the name of everlasting wonderment. There are two kinds of this wonderment. One is experienced during the state of sukr and the other one during the state of sehav". (Both of these states are described in the Glossary of Sufi Terms). "If it prevails in the state of sehav, it amounts to kufr, (disbelief or faithlessness) but if it prevails in the state of sukr then it is Ma 'Arifat because there can be no doubt whatever in the existence or presence of Allah in this state. And it is by this wonderment of Allah's existence that a Sufi's faith is strengthened and conclusively confirmed."
Hazrat Bayazid Bastami says that "Ma’arifat is the source of conviction of a Sufi that everything of the universe is under the dominating control and power of Allah, that nobody else has any authority whatever upon His kingdom; that everything has its connection with Allah; that everything is at the mercy of His command and that everything derives its qualification from the store-house of Allah's qualifications; that everything which is manifesting itself is manipulated by His Power and, lastly, that all the moving and stationary objects of the world, like the mountains, skies, earth, etc. are in their places because of His wish to keep this most wonderful drama of His creation going under the "Divine Scheme of  Things"--an everlasting Divine Order of the Universe.
(2) Tauheed (Unity of Allah)
The second Hijaab or veil is that of Tauheed (Oneness or Unity) of Allah. There are three kinds: (1) That Allah Himself is aware of His Oneness; (2) that He commands man to accept and recognize His oneness; and (3) that people know about the Oneness of Allah.
And when a Sufi attains the knowledge of Allah's realization, he feels that Allah is One who recognizes no duality in His existence, that He is eternally ancient and, therefore, free of all changes incidental to every thing of the world. He Allah is not limited to the four walls of a house; He needs no home to live in. Allah has no soul for which a body is needed to get in. Allah has no body in any shape or form whatever for which He might need a soul. He is born of no parents and nothing changes His Oneness and divine attributes. Allah has lived ever since, and shall live for all time. He knows, hears, sees and speaks. He does what He wishes and He wishes what He knows. Allah’s Commandments are His wish for the good of mankind on earth and, religiously speaking, mankind has no choice but to submit to and obey Him faithfully. He is the cause of all profit and loss. He alone can judge best all the affairs of both the worlds.
Of all the fundamental principles, recognized by great religions of the world, Tauheed, i.e. Allah's Oneness, is the main pillar over which their basic structures stand.
(3) Iman (Faith)
The third veil is of Iman (faith) which is the mainspring of every religion of the world, and not of Islam alone. What is the cause of Iman? Is it Ma’arifat or obedience? One group of Sufis maintains that the cause of Iman (faith) is Ma’arifat, because it is through Ma’arifat that man sees the wonderments and the astonishing manifestations of Allah which convince him of His existence, apart from all the other enormous amount of evidence illuminating between heaven and earth.
If there is only Ma’arifat and no obedience of man, Allah may not question him about his faith. But if there is neither obedience nor Ma’arifat, then man would be answerable to Allah for his faith, and he will never have salvation or peace in both the worlds.
As a matter of fact, Iman is a highly delicate spring in the machinery of deen (religion). Hazrat Ali Hujwari says, "there can be no Ma’arifat without Iman and obedience". Ma’arifat is the name of shauq (fondness) and love, and the root of all fondness and love is obedience. The more that fondness and love flare up in one's heart, the more is one's obedience to and respect for Allah and His commandments.
It is wrong to say that obedience is necessary only up to the stage of acquiring Ma’arifat, and that after it is once attained, a Sufi is saved of all his strivings and other wordily duties. When a Sufi's heart. by his constant devotion, becomes the abode of Allah's love, his eyes become the abode of Allah's manifestations and his life becomes the subject of Divine teachings. But even then the body must not give up His obedience and, in fact, it cannot.
(4) Tahaarat (Cleanliness)
The fourth Hijaab (veil) is that of Tahaarat (cleanliness). After Iman, Tahaarat is an imperative link of the Sufi's life. It has two kinds: (1) Tahaarat-e-Zaahir or outwardly cleanliness concerning the purity of his body; and (2) Tahaarat-e-Baatin or inward cleanliness. Without Tahaarat-e-Zaahir, Salat or prayer and all other devotional rites are not permissible or acceptable under the law of Shariat. Tahaarat-e-Baatin means purity of heart and spirit without which no Ma’arifat can be attained.
(5) Tauba (Repentance)
A default in the conduct of a Sufi or Muslim is forgivable by offering Tauba (repentance) before Allah. It can ward off Allah's wrath against man's sins. There are three conditions of Tauba: (1) repentance for opposition and default in breaking the Divine Law; (2) repentance that this default or opposition should not have been occasioned after any previous repentance; and (3) that there should be no idea of returning towards any pre-Tauba faults and shortcomings after the repentance.

These conditions are possible only when one feels ashamed of his sins. For this shamefulness too, there are 3 conditions: (1) fear of punishment, (2) knowledge of the fact that sinful deeds are to be punished, and (3) repentance for previous lapses of disobedience, because Allah sees and knows everything which a man does.
(6) Salat (Namaz or Prayer)
The sixth Hijaab (veil) is that of Salat, the Islamic prayer. Hazrat All Hujwari describes various beneficial meanings of Salat in the light of Sufism. He says: "Salat not only puts the devotee on the path leading to Allah but also opens up all the secrets of this path to a keenly devoted mind." For instance, wuzu (ablution) means outward cleanliness of the body, the first and foremost condition to prepare for Salat. Then comes tauba (repentance) which means inner cleanliness of the devotee. Then comes the standing posture facing towards Kaaba, which means the devotee's implicit faith in and devotion to Allah. Then comes Qayaam which means struggle against Nafs. Then starts the Qirat (recitation of certain Qur’anic verses) which means zikr or remembrance of Allah. Then follows ruku (the first forward bending-pose) which denotes humility overpowering the Nafs. Then comes Tashhed-e-Uns which indicates assertion of the devotee's complete faith in and love for Allah. And finally comes Salaam which means to turn away from all worldly attractions with the blessings of Allah. This is a brief analysis of the benefits or philosophy of Salat as interpreted by Sufis. See also "Postures of the Prophets" for further explanations of the benefits and features of Salat.
Concentration In Salat
Real Salat is that during which the devotee himself is present in Aalam-e-Nasoot (in this world) but his soul sours high in Aalam-e-Arwah (the spiritual world). This is the most difficult kind of Salat which only prophets, awlia (saints) and great Sufis can perform. Common people need a lot of concentration practice to do it, and yet they may fail.

Hazrat Hatira Asum used to say: "When I offer my Salat, I see Paradise at my right and hell at my back."
(7) Zakat (Charity)
The seventh Hijaab (veil) is that of Zakat, the religious tax under Shariat to help the poor and the needy which has a direct bearing upon a Muslim's faith. Hazrat Ali Hujwari says: "A Sufi in this respect must not be a philanthropist, who makes distinction in granting charity. But he must be like a Jawad who makes no discrimination at all in charity. The rich make discrimination in offering Zakat from their good or bad earnings. But a Sufi must act like a Jawad who makes no such discrimination."

On what grounds a Sufi who has renounced the world and has no assets, no trade or business to earn anything is eligible to pay Zakat? He has to live on Tawakkal (absolute trust and reliance upon Allah for every need). Zakat is not only leviable upon one's wealth and frugality. It also is payable on other benefits of life also, such as the blessings of Allah enjoyed by man at every step of his life, particularly the enjoyment of his sound physical health and fitness. He can and must certainly offer his share of Zakat in gratitude to Allah. Did not Allah gracious keep him and his limbs fit to perform his Salat? There is no wealth better than health. Hence gratitude is the kind of Zakat which even the poorest can afford to pay in return of Allah's blessings.
(8) Sayaam (Fasting)
The eight Hijaab (veil) is that of Sayaam (fasting). Sayaam means control of the passions and desires of Nafs under the pain of hunger and thirst for at least thirty days in a year as a means of regular training and practice for a disciplined life. Hunger not only controls the Nafs and its desires. but it also creates humility in one's behavior. Although hunger emaciates the body physically, yet it generates a devotee's spiritual force which kindles divine light in the heart and develops will-power.

Hazrat Abul Abbas Qassab used to say: "When I eat I find the substance of evil and sin in me, and when I draw hand from eating, I find this act to be the reality of all devotion." Hazrat Abdullah Tastari used to take his food only once in a fortnight, while throughout the thirty days of Ramadan (fasting month) he took no other meals except Iftaar (light refreshments taken to break the fast). Hazrat Ibrahim Adham also did the same during the Ramadan month in spite of the fact that he had to go out daily under the burning sun to cut and gather corn in the fields to earn his living. But the real splendor of this example lies in that whatever wages he earned by such a hard toil, he cheerfully distributed the same among the poor and the needy.
(9) Hajj (Pilgrimage To Kaaba)
The ninth Hijaab (veil) is that of Hajj. Hazrat The Hajj for a Sufi is the occasion for offering his tauba (repentance) to Allah."
During the Hajj there are various rituals: (1) wearing of ihram (the solitary white cloth) means giving up all bad habits; (2) staying in Arafaat means absorption of divine love; (3) going to Muzdalifa means giving up of the passions of Nafs; (4) Tawaaf, or making rounds of the Kaaba, means seeing the divinity of Allah; (5) coming back to Mina means forgetting all desires of one's heart; (6) running in Sara and Marwa means purifying the heart and soul; (7) Qurbani or sacrifice means sacrificing all the desires and passions of Nafs; and (8) throwing of pebbles at the devil means throwing away of the bad companions and associates.
Hazrat Ali Hujwari adds: "If a Sufi fails to observe and learn the foregoing lessons from his pilgrimage to Kaaba, his going for Hajj will make no difference to him and will indeed be an aimless and vain show."
(10) Mushaheda (Coming Face to Face with Divine Light)
The tenth Hijaab (veil) is that of mushaheda, that is, coming face to face with the Divine Light. Hazrat Ali Hujwari thinks that "Hajj is the only place of mushaheda for a Sufi." Hazrat Abul Abbas says: "Mushaheda means a Sufi's unswerving faith surcharged with overwhelming love for Allah; the devotee sees nothing else except the Light of Allah all around." Hazrat Shaikh Shibli says: "In everything I saw, I found the Light of Allah in myriad colors and forms,"
(11) Aadaab-E-Saalik (Scrupulous Etiquette Of The Sufi)
The etiquette (behavior) of a Sufi is a very complex topic. The following points give some sense of the extraordinary life attitudes engendered in the Sufi:
(1) A Sufi must staunchly adhere to the commandments of Allah and traditions .of the Prophet.
(2) A Sufi must necessarily maintain cordial relations with the public indiscriminately.
(3) A Sufi must seek the company of other great Sufis as far as possible.
(4) A Sufi must welcome all who come to him with love and due regard.
(5) If a Sufi undertakes a journey. it should be strictly for the sake of Allah; i.e. for Hajj, Jihad, seeking of knowledge, etc.
(6) A Sufi must eat very little like a patient and his food should have been procured by honest means; he must try to avoid invitations from the worldly people.
(7) A Sufi must never go to the courts of kings and must refuse to accept any kind of rewards or gratifications for his maintenance.
(8) A Sufi must walk in all humility without the slightest tinge of pride or vanity.
(9) A Sufi must sleep as little as possible in order to save time for his devotional duties.
(10) A Sufi must observe silence because silence is better than speech, but if he must speak then talking in favour of Allah and Truth is always better than silence.
(11) Bachelorship for a Sufi is against Sunnah, but if he wishes to be aloof of the world, then it is his ornament.
Conclusion
Sufism is a vast and most intricate divine subject to deal with in English, specially in a limited space. It is a special spiritual branch of Islam, as we have seen. It is indeed a Divine Knowledge which is bestowed by Allah upon a selected few for the benefit of humanity. Within the history of Islam, Sufism has carved out and built up a most brilliant history, a force for rejuvenating and strengthening Islam, against its enemies--the forces of the devil and his unbridled materialism.

namaz kılmıyorsan oku

Seyyid metin Erol
Gerçek bir arkadaşın arkadaşına nasihati
Bizim mahallede, inşaat ustalığı yapan, orta yaşlarda, çok fazla sigara içen, caminin önünden dahi geçmeyen bir arkadaşı, bir gün kahvede yakaladım.
-Neden hiç camiye gelmiyorsun? dedim.
-Ben namaz kılmıyorum dedi.
... -Fazla sigara içiyorsun herhalde? dedim.
-Evet, çok içiyorum dedi.
-En pahalı sigara hangisi?
Ben pek fiyatları bilmiyorum dedim.
-O da, Şu marka...
Dört milyon küsûr dedi.
-Eğer vaktin varsa, istersen konuşalım dedim;
-Müsaitim, buyur konuşalım dedi.
Kahveciye, İki çay getir bize dedim, kahveci çayları getirdi, içiyoruz...
Buna; Farzet bir sigara bayiinin önünden geçiyorsun.
Biraz önce söylemiş olduğun o en pahalı ...
marka sigarayı istedin.
Adam sigarayı sana verdi.
Sen tam paraya davrandın ki, adam Yok, istemez, benden olsun dedi.
Sigaranın parasını senden almadı.
Sen, ikinci defa o sigara bayiinin önünden geçerken nasıl geçersin?
Dört milyon küsûr para almadı diye, elini göğsünün üstüne koyarsın da geçersin değil mi? dedim.
Bu, Tabii dedi. Peki, yarın Cenab-ı Hak, huzuru ilahide;
Kulum, ben seni yokluk âleminden varlık âlemine getirdim.
Seni ağaç yapmadım, taş yapmadım, hayvan yapmadım, insan yaptım.
Bahusus Müslüman anne-babadan dünyaya getirdim.
Dağlarda koyunlara, keçilere ot yedirdim, ama sütünü, yoğurdunu, peynirini sana yedirdim.
Akşama kadar ineklere saman yedirdim, yağını peynirini, çökeleğini sana yedirdim.
Kulum, akşama kadar tavuklar gübre deşti, ama doğurduğu yumurtayı ona değil de sana yedirdim.
Bir paket sigara verip de para almayan o adamın önünde eğilerek geçmeyi aklın kabul etti de, bu kadar nimet veren Rabbine karşı niçin Ezan-ı Muhammedî okunduğu zaman namaz kılıp benim huzurumda eğilmedin? derse, yüzün kızarmayacak mı?
Bırak cenneti
-cehennemi, yüzün kızarmayacak mı? dedim.
Ben böyle söyleyince; adam,
-Bu söz ciğerime işledi.
Ben bir daha namazımı geçirmem deyip bir eve gidiyor, gidiş o gidiş.
O günden sonra Allah c.c izniyle beş vakit namaza başlıyor...
Dua ile

Vird Çekmek Zormu Geliyor???

Vird Çekmek Zormu Geliyor???

Kardeşlerim bir çoğumuzda vird çekmek çok zor bir virajdır, vird bir türlü bitmez,uzar gider,arada bir sayı tesbihini yoklarız kaç kalmış diye,vird esnasında gaflete düşeriz ve sürekli dünya ile alakalı mevzuları düşünürüz.

Sonuç olarak kalp çalışmaz,hallerimiz ziyadeleşmez ve vird lezzet veren bir amel değil sıkıntı olan bir amele döner.. Peki çözüm ne olabilir.. EBU OSMAN HİRİ KSA ŞÖYLE BUYURMAKTADIR..;Sofiler ..! Zikr çekmek herkese nasip olmaz. Ancak Allah isterse vird çekebilirsiniz. Allah sevmediği istemediği hoşlanmadığı kulunun kalbine zikr etme fısatını vermez.
...
Eğer sen tesbih çekiyorsan Allah istediği için çekiyorsun yoksa Sen kendiliğinden tesbih çekemessin.devamla.. Sofiler virdden sonra çok şükredin,Allahu teala size vird çekme fırsatı verdiği için. Eğer şükrederseniz Haliniz ve kalp durumunuz ziyadeleşir artar..

Ayette de buyurduğu gibi; ''Eğer şükrederseniz elbetteki nimetimi arttırırım.

Çarşamba, Temmuz 17

Ibn al-'Arabi, by William C. Chittick

Ibn al-'Arabi, by William C. Chittick (State University of New York)
       EBN AL-'ARABI, MOHYI-al-DIN Abu 'Abd-Allah Mohammad Ta'i Hatemi (b. 17
       Ramadan 560/28 July 1165; d. 22 Rabi' II 638/10 November 1240), the most
       influential Sufi author of later Islamic history, known to his supporters as al-Shaykh
       al-akbar, "the Greatest Master." Although the form "Ebn al-'Arabi," with the
       definite article, is found in his autographs and in the writings of his immediate
       followers, many later authors referred to him as 'Ebn 'Arabi', without the article, to
       differentiate him from Qadi Abu Bakr Ebn al-'Arabi (d. 543/1148). 
 

       Life, views, terminology.

       He was born in Murcia in Spain, and his family moved to Seville when he was eight.
       He experienced an extraordinary mystical "unveiling" (kashf) or "opening" (fotuh)
       at about the age of fifteen; this is mentioned in his famous account of his meeting
       with Averroes (Addas, pp. 53-58; Chittick, 1989, pp. xiii-xiv). Only after this original
       divine "attraction" (jadhba) did he begin disciplined Sufi practice (soluk), perhaps
       at the age of twenty (Addas, p. 53; Chittick, 1989, pp. 383-84). He studied the
       traditional sciences, Hadith in particular, with many masters; he mentions about
       ninety of these in an autobiographical note (Badawi). In 597/1200 he left Spain for
       good, with the intention of making the hajj. The following year in Mecca he began
       writing his monumental al-Fotuhat al-makkiya; the title, "The Meccan Openings,"
       alludes to the inspired nature of the book. In 601/1204 he set off from Mecca on his
       way to Anatolia with Majd-al-Din Eshaq, whose son Sadr-al-Din Qunawi (606-73/
       1210-74) would be his most influential disciple. After moving about for several years
       in the central Islamic lands, never going as far as Persia, he settled in Damascus in
       620/1223. There he taught and wrote until his death.
       Ebn al-'Arabi was an extraordinarily prolific author. Osman Yahia counts 850
       works attributed to him, of which 700 are extant and over 450 probably genuine.
       The second edition of the Fotuhat (Cairo, 1329/1911) covers 2,580 pages, while
       Yahia's new critical edition is projected to include thirty-seven volumes of about five
       hundred pages each (vol. 14, Cairo, 1992). By comparison, his most famous work,
       Fosus al-hekam (Bezels of widsom), is less than 180 pages long. Scores of his books
       and treatises have been published, mostly in uncritical editions; several have been
       translated into European languages.        Although Ebn al-'Arabi claims that the Fotuhat is derived from divine
       "openings"ómystical unveilingsóand that the Fosus was handed to him in a
       vision by the Prophet, he would certainly admit that he expressed his visions in the
       language of his intellectual milieu. He cites the Koran and Hadith constantly; it
       would be no exaggeration to say that most of his works are commentaries on these
       two sources of the tradition. He sometimes quotes aphorisms from earlier Sufis, but
       never long passages. There is no evidence that he quotes without ascription, in the
       accepted style, from other authors. He was thoroughly familiar with the Islamic
       sciences, especially tafsir, feqh, and kalam. He does not seem to have studied
       the works of the philosophers, though many of his ideas are prefigured in the works
       of such authors as the Ekhwan-al-Safa' (q.v.; Rosenthal; Takeshita). He mentions on
       several occasions having read the Ehya' of GHazali, and he sometimes refers to such
       well known Sufi authors as Qoshayri.        In short, Ebn al-'Arabi was firmly grounded in the mainstream of the Islamic
       tradition; the starting points of his discussions would have been familiar to the
       'olama' in his environment. At the same time he was enormously original, and he
       was fully aware of the newness of what he was doing. Most earlier Sufis had spoken
       about theoretical issues (as opposed to practical teachings) in a brief or allusive
       fashion. Ebn al-'Arabi breaks the dam with a torrent of exposition on every sort of
       theoretical issue related to the "divine things" (elahiyat). He maintains a uniformly
       high level of discourse and, in spite of going over the same basic themes constantly,
       he offers a different perspective in each fresh look at a question. For example, in
       the Fosus al-hekam, each of twenty-seven chapters deals with the divine wisdom
       revealed to a specific divine wordóa particular prophet. In each case, the wisdom is
       associated with a different divine attribute. Hence, each prophet represents a
       different mode of knowing and experiencing the reality of God. Most of the 560
       chapters of the Fotuhat are rooted in similar principles. Each chapter represents a
       "standpoint" or "station" (maqam) from which reality, or a specific dimension of
       reality, can be surveyed and brought into the overarching perspective of the
       "oneness of all things" (tawhid).        Ebn al-'Arabi assumed and then verified through his own personal experience the
       validity of the re-velation that was given primarily in the Koran and secondarily in
       the Hadith. He objected to the limiting approaches of kalam and philosophy, which
       tied all understanding to reason ('aql), as well as to the approach of those Sufis
       who appealed only to unveiling (kashf). It may be fair to say that his major
       methodological contribution was to reject the stance of the kalam authorities, for
       whom tashbih (declaring God similar to creation) was a heresy, and to make
       tashbih the necessary complement of tanzih (declaring God incomparable with
       creation). This perspective leads to an epistemology that harmonizes reason and
       unveiling.        For Ebn al-'Arabi, reason functions through differentiation and discernment; it
       knows innately that God is absent from all things (tanzih). In contrast, unveiling
       functions through imagination, which perceives identity and sameness rather than
       difference; hence unveiling sees God's presence rather than his absenceótashbih.
       To maintain that God is either absent or present is, in his terms, to see with only one
       eye. Perfect knowledge of God involves seeing with both eyes, the eye of reason and
       the eye of unveiling (or imagination). This is the wisdom of the prophets; it is
       falsified by those theologians, philosophers, and Sufis who stress either tanzih or
       tashbih at the expense of the other.        If Ebn al-'Arabi's methodology focuses on harmonizing two modes of knowing, his
       actual teachings focus more on bringing out the nature of human perfection and the
       means to achieve it. Although the term al-ensan al-kamel "the perfect human
       being" can be found in earlier authors, it is Ebn al-'Arabi who makes it a central
       theme of Sufism. Briefly, perfect human beings are those who live up to the
       potential that was placed in Adam when God "taught him all the names" (Koran
       2:30). These names designate every perfection found in God and the cosmos
       (al-'alam, defined as "everything other than God"). Ultimately, the names taught to
       Adam are identical with the divine attributes, such as life, awareness, desire, power,
       speech, generosity, and justice. By actualizing the names within themselves, human
       beings become perfect images of God and achieve God's purpose in creating the
       universe (Chittick, 1989, especially chap. 20).         Even though all perfect human beingsói.e., the prophets and the "friends" (awlia')
       of Godóare identical in one respect, each of them manifests God's uniqueness in
       another respect. In effect, each is dominated by one specific divine attributeóthis is
       the theme of the Fosus. Moreover, the path to human fulfillment is a never-ending
       progression whereby people come to embody God's infinite attributes successively
       and with ever-increasing intensity. Most of Ebn al-'Arabi's writings are devoted to
       explaining the nature of the knowledge that is unveiled to those who travel through
       the ascending stations or standpoints of human perfection. God's friends are those
       who inherit their knowledge, stations, and states from the prophets, the last of
       whom was Mohammad. When Ebn al-'Arabi claimed to be the "seal of the
       MoHammadan friends" (khatam al-awlia' al-mohammadiya), he was saying that no
       one after him would inherit fully from the prophet Mohammad. Muslim friends of
       God would continue to exist until the end of time, but now they would inherit from
       other prophets inasmuch as those prophets represent certain aspects of
       Mohammad's all-embracing message (Chodkiewicz, 1986).        The most famous idea attributed to Ebn al-'Arabi is wahdat al-wojud "the oneness
       of being." Although he never employs the term, the idea is implicit throughout his
       writings. In the manner of both theologians and philosophers, Ebn al-'Arabi
       employs the term wojud to refer to God as the Necessary Being. Like them, he also
       attributes the term to everything other than God, but he insists that wojud does not
       belong to the things found in the cosmos in any real sense. Rather, the things
       borrow wojud from God, much as the earth borrows light from the sun. The issue
       is how wojud can rightfully be attributed to the things, also called "entities"
       (a'yan). From the perspective of tanzih, Ebn al-'Arabi declares that wojud
       belongs to God alone, and, in his famous phrase, the things "have never smelt a
       whiff of wojud." From the point of view of tashbih, he affirms that all things are
       wojud's self-disclosure (tajalli) or self-manifestation (zohur). In sum, all things
       are "He/not He" (howa la howa), which is to say that they are both God and other
       than God, both wojud and other than wojud.         The intermediateness of everything that can be perceived by the senses or the mind
       brings us back to imagination, a term that Ebn al-'Arabi applies not only to a mode
       of understanding that grasps identity rather than difference, but also to the World
       of Imagination, which is situated between the two fundamental worlds that make up
       the cosmosóthe world of spirits and the world of bodiesóand which brings
       together the qualities of the two sides. In addition, Ebn al-'Arabi refers to the whole
       cosmos as imagination, because it combines the attributes of wojud and utter
       nonexistence (Chittick, 1989).
 

       Influence on Persian Sufis and Philosophers. 

       Tracing Ebn al-'Arabi's influence in any detail must await an enormous amount of
       research into both his own writings and the works of later authors. Most modern
       scholars agree that his influence is obvious in much of the theoretical writing of
       later Sufism and discernible in works by theologians and philosophers.
       Wahdat al-wojud, invariably associated with Ebn al-'Arabi's name, is the most
       famous single theoretical issue in Sufi works of the later period, especially in the
       area under Persian cultural influence. Not everyone thought it was an appropriate
       concept, and scholars such as Ebn Taymiya (d. 728/1328) attacked it vehemently. In
       fact, Ebn Taymiya deserves much of the credit for associating this idea with Ebn
       al-'Arabi's name and for making it the criterion, as it were, of judging whether an
       author was for or against Ebn al-'Arabi (on this complex issue, see Chittick,
       forthcoming).         Although Ebn al-'Arabi's name is typically associated with theoretical issues, this
       should not suggest that his influence reached only learned Sufis. He was the author
       of many practical works on Sufism, including collections of prayers, and he
       transmitted a kherqa that was worn by a number of later shaikhs of various orders.
       As M. Chodkiewicz (1991) has illustrated, his radiance permeated all levels of Sufi
       life and practice, from the most elite to the most popular, and this has continued
       down to modern times. Today, indeed, his influence seems to be on the increase,
       both in the Islamic world and in the West. The Muhyiddin Ibn 'Arabi Society, which
       publishes a journal in Oxford, is only one of many signs of a renewed attention to
       his teachings.        Ebn al-'Arabi's first important contact with Persian Islam may have come through
       one of his teachers, Makin-al-Din Abu Shoja' Zaher  b. Rostam Esfahani, whom he
       met in Mecca in 598/1202 and with whom he studied the Sahih of Termedhi. He
       speaks especially highly of Makin-al-Din's elderly sister, whom he calls
       Shaykhat-al-Hejaz ("Mistress of Hejaz"), Fakhr-al-Nesa' ("Pride of womankind") bent
       Rostam, adding that she was also Fakhr-al-Rejal ("Pride of men") and that he had
       studied Hadith with her. It was Makin-al-Din's daughter, Nezam, who inspired Ebn
       al-'Arabi to write his famous collection of poetry, Tarjoman al-ashwaq (Nicholson,
       pp. 3-4; Jahangiri, pp. 59-62).        In 602/1205 Ebn al-'Arabi met the well-known Sufi Awhad-al-Din Kermani (d.
       635/1238) in Konya and became his close friend; he mentions him on a number of
       occasions in the Fotuhat (Chodkiewicz et al., pp. 288, 563; Addas, pp. 269-73).
       Awhad-al-Din's biographer tells us that Ebn al-'Arabi entrusted his stepson Qunawi
       to Awhad-al-Din for training (Foruzanfar, pp. 86-87), and Qunawi confirms in a
       letter that he was Kermani's companion for two years, traveling with him as far as
       Shiraz (Chittick, 1992b, p. 261 ).        Qunawi is the most important intermediary through which Ebn al-'Arabi's
       teachings passed into the Persian-speaking world. He taught Hadith for many years
       in Konya and was on good terms with Jalal-al-Din Rumi, but there is no evidence in
       Rumi's works to support the oft-repeated assertion that he was influenced by the
       ideas of Ebn al-'Arabi or Qunawi (Chittick, forthcoming). Nevertheless, Rumi's
       commentators typically interpreted him in terms of Ebn al-'Arabi's teachings, which
       had come to define the Sufi intellectual universe.         Qunawi is the author of about fifteen Arabic works, including seven books and a
       number of relatively short treatises. These works are much more systematic and
       structured than those of his master. His focus on certain specific issues in Ebn
       al-'Arabi's writings, such as wojud and the perfect human being (al-ensan
       al-kamel), helped ensure that these would remain the central concern of the school.
       Certain terms typically ascribed to Ebn al-'Arabi, such as al-hadarat al-elahiya
       al-khams, "the five divine presences," seem to be Qunawi's coinages. In al-Fokuk
       (ed. M. Khúajavi, Tehran, 1371Sh./1992), Qunawi explains the significance of the
       chapter headings of the Fosus; this work was used directly or indirectly by
       practically all the Fosus commentators (Chittick, 1984).         Qunawi wrote a few minor Persian works, but probably not Tabserat al-mobtadi
       or Matale'-e iman, both of which have been printed in his name (Chittick, 1992b,
       pp. 255-59). However, from at least 643/1245 he taught the Ta'iya of Ebn al-Fared
       in Persian, and his lectures were put together as a systematic commentary on the
       poem by his student Sa'id-al-Din Fargani (d. 695/1296) as Mashareq al-darari (ed.
       S. J. Ashtiani, Mashhad, 1398/1978). This work was extremely popular, but even more
       so was his much expanded Arabic version of the same work, Montaha'l-madarek
       (Cairo, 1293/1876).        The most widely read Persian work by Qunawi's students was no doubt the
       Lama'at of Fakhr-al-Din 'Eraqi (d. 688/1289), which is based on Qunawi's lectures
       on Ebn al-'Arabi's Fosus (Chittick and Wilson). Mo'ayyed-al-Din Jandi (d. ca.
       700/1300), who was initiated into Sufism by Qunawi, wrote in Arabic the first
       detailed commentary on the Fosus (ed. Ashtiani, Mashhad, 1361 Sh./1982) as well as a
       number of Persian works, including Nafhat al-ruh (ed. N. Mayel Heravi, Tehran,
       1362 Sh./1983; despite the editor's claim of a unique Tehran manuscript, there are at
       least two other copies in Istanbul [Shehit Ali Pasha 1439, Haci Mahmud Efendi 2447],
       the first an expanded version).         Jandi taught the Fosus to 'Abd-al-Razzaq Kashani (d. 730/1330), who wrote one of
       the most widely disseminated commentaries (Cairo, 1386/1966); it often summarizes
       or paraphrases Jandi's text. Kashani wrote several other important works, both in
       Arabic and Persian, all of which are rooted in Ebn al-'Arabi's universe of discourse.
       His Ta'wil al-Qor'an has been published in Ebn al-'Arabi's name (Beirut, 1968; for
       passages in English, see Murata); although permeated with Ebn al-'Arabi's basic
       world view, there are important differences of perspective that mark Kashani as an
       independent thinker (Lory; Morris, 1987, pp. 101-06). A Persian work on fotowwat
       (fotuwa) has also been published (Tohfat al-ekhwan fi khasa'es al-fetyan, ed. M.
       Sarraf in Rasa'el-e javanmardan, Tehran, 1973).        Persian commentaries on the Fosus are frequently based on the Arabic
       commentary of Kashani's student, Dawud Qaysari (d. 751/1350), author of a dozen
       other Arabic works. His systematic philosophical introduction to Sharh al-Fosus
       (Tehran, 1299/1882; Bombay, 1300/1883) itself became the object of commentaries
       (for the latest, see Ashtiani, 1385/1966). Certainly, Qaysari's influence is obvious and
       acknowledged in the first Persian commentary on the Fosus, Nosus al-khosus
       (partly edited by R. Mazlumi, Tehran, 1359 Sh./ 1980), written by his student Baba
       Rokn-al-Din Shirazi (d. 769/1367). The Persian commentary by Taj-al-Din Hosayn b.
       Hasan Khwarazmi (d. ca. 835/1432; ed. N. Mayel Heravi, Tehran, 1364 Sh./1985) is
       almost a verbatim translation of Qaysari. Other Persian commentaries include
       Hall-e Fosus by Sayyed 'Ali Hamadani (d. 786/1385); this work has been wrongly
       attributed to Khwaja Parsa in its printed edition (ed. J. Mesgarneëad, Tehran, 1366
       Sh./1987; see Mayel Heravi, 1988, pp. xxi-xxvii). In his comprehensive list of the more
       than one hundred commentaries on the Fosus, Osman Yahia mentions ten in
       Persian, some of which, however, may be repeats (introduction to Amoli, pp. 16-36).
       Persian commentaries that he does not mention include the following: 1. Khatam
       al-Fosus, attributed to Shah Ne'mat-Allah Wali (d. 834/1437); this is much longer
       than any of Shah Ne'mat-Allah's printed rasa'el (manuscripts include Nadwat
       al-'Olama' 35; Andhra Pradesh State Oriental Manuscript Library, Tasawwof 254,
       Jadid 715; Khodabakhsh, Farsi 1371). 2. Another long commentary is also attributed to
       Shah Ne'mat-Allah (Andhra Pradesh, Tasawwof 185). 3. Shaikh Mohebb-Allah
       Mobarez Elahabadi (d. 1048/1648), Ebn al-'Arabi's most faithful Indian follower,
       wrote a lengthy Persian commentary and a shorter Arabic commentary. 4. Hafez
       GHolam-Mostáafa b. Mo-hammad-Akbar from Thaneswar wrote Shokhus al-hemam fi
       sharh Fosus al-hekam, a commentary of 1024 pages in the Andhra Pradesh copy
       (Tasawwof 296), apparently in the 11th/18th century. The last Persian commentary
       on the Fosus in India seems to be al-Ta'wil al-mohkam fi motashabah Fosus
       al-hekam by Mawlawi Mohammad-Hasan Saheb Amruhawi; he was living in
       Hyderabad (Deccan) when this 500-page work was published in Lucknow in 1893.         A number of Qunawi's contemporaries not directly connected to his circle were
       important in making at least some of Ebn al-'Arabi's teachings available to Persian
       speakers. Sa'd-al-Din Hamuya (d. 649/1252), a Persian disciple of Najm-al-Din
       Kobra, corresponded with Ebn al-'Arabi and spent several years in Damascus,
       where he met both Ebn al-'Arabi and Qunawi. He wrote works in both Arabic and
       Persian; these are often extremely difficult, especially because the author delighted
       in letter symbolism (for a Persian work, see al-Mesbah fi'l-tasawwof, ed. N. Mayel
       Heravi, Tehran, 1362 Sh./1983). His disciple 'Aziz-al-Din Nasafi (d. before 700/1300)
       was responsible for making some of Ebn al-'Arabi's terminology well-known in
       Persian; his popularizing works can hardly be compared in sophistication to those of
       'Eraqi or Fargani (see, e.g., his Ensan-e kamel, ed. M. MoleÇ, Tehran, 1962; an
       English paraphrase of his Maqsad-e aqsa was published by E. H. Palmer as
       Oriental Mysticism, London, 1867; see also Morris, pp. 745-51). Shams-al-Din
       Ebrahim Abarquhi began to write Majma' al-bahrayn (ed. N. Mayel Heravi,
       Tehran, 1364 Sh./1985) in 714/1314. The work represents an early effort to integrate
       Ebn al-'Arabi's teachings into Persian Sufism; more sophisticated than Nasafi, the
       author does not have the strong philosophical orientation typical of Qunawi and his
       circle.        Among early Persian poets influenced by Ebn al-'Arabi's teachings and terminology
       were 'Eraqi, Maghrebi, and Mahmud Shabestari (d. ca. 720/1320). Mohammad Lahiji
       (d. 912/1506) commented on Shabestari's thousand-verse Golshan-e raz in Sharh-e
       Golshan-e raz, a long Persian work rooted in the writings of Kashani and Qaysari.
       One of Ebn al-'Arabi's most learned and successful popularizers was the poet
       'Abd-al-Rahman Jami (d. 898/1492), especially through his gazals and mathnawis;
       about 1,000 verses of his Selselat al-dhahab carefully follow the text of Ebn
       al-'Arabi's Helyat al-abdal (Mayel Heravi, 1988, pp. xxxvii-xl). Jami's Persian
       prose works dealing with Ebn al-'Arabi's teachingsóthe Lawa'eh, Lawame',
       Ashe''at al-lama'at, and Naqd al-nosus fi sharh Naqsh al-Fosusóas well as his
       Arabic commentary on the Fosus, were also widely read (see introduction to Jami,
       1977). Jami was especially popular in India, and most of the numerous followers of
       Ebn al-'Arabi in the subcontinentówho were much more likely to write in Persian
       than in Arabicóare indebted to his explications of the Shaikh's works (Chittick,
       1992d). Mohammad b. Mohammad, who was known as Shaikh-e Makki (d.
       926/1020) and considered himself a disciple of Jami, defended Ebn al-'Arabi against
       attacks by narrow-minded critics in his Persian al-Janeb al-garbi fi hall moshkelat
       al-shaykh Mohyi-al-Din Ebn 'Arabi (ed. Mayel Heravi, Tehran, 1364 Sh./1985).        The poet and Sufi master Shah Ne'mat-Allah Wali was one of Ebn al-'Arabi's most
       fervent admirers and followed closely in the tracks of Kashani and Qaysari. He
       wrote over one hundred rasalas (treatises) on theoretical and practical Sufism that
       fit squarely into Ebn al-'Arabi's universe; four of these comment on the Fosus or
       Naqsh al-Fosus, Ebn al-'Arabi's own treatise on the essential ideas of the Fosus.
       The Perso-Indian poet Mirza 'Abd-al-Qader Bidel (=Be@dil, q.v.; d. 1133/1721)
       demonstrates an intimate knowledge of Ebn al-'Arabi's school in such mathnawis
       as 'Erfan.         Even Sufi authors critical of Ebn al-'Arabi's teachings adopted much of his
       terminology and world view. Thus in Persia 'Ala'-al-Dawla Semnani (d. 736/1337)
       and in India Shaikh Mohammad Hosayni, known as Gisu-Deraz (d. 825/1422), and
       Shaikh Ahmad Serhendi (d. 1034/1634) do not diverge markedly from most of the
       teachings established by him and his immediate followers. Most Sufis did not take
       the criticisms of these authors too seriously. Typical are the remarks of Sayyed
       Ashraf Jahangir Semnani (d. probably in 829/1425), who studied with 'Ala'-al-Dawla
       Semnani but sided with Kashani in his defense of Ebn al-'Arabi against Semnani's
       criticisms (see Landolt, 1973). After providing the views of the participants in this
       debate and those of a number of observers, Sayyed Ashraf tells us that Semnani had
       not understood what Ebn al-'Arabi was saying and that he had retracted his
       criticisms before the end of his life (Yamani, Latáa'ef-e ashrafi, latáifa 28, pp.
       139-45; Mayel Heravi, 1367, pp. xxxi-xxxv). In a similar manner, Shah Wali-Allah
       Dehlawi (d. 1176/1762) wrote a work showing that there was no fundamental
       difference between Ebn al-'Arabi's wahdat al-wojud and Serhendi's wahdat
       al-shohud.         From the 8th/14th century onward Ebn al-'Arabi's influence is clearly present in
       many works written by authors known primarily as theologians or philosophers.
       Among Shi'ites, Sayyed Haydar Amoli (d. 787/1385) was especially important in
       bringing Ebn al-'Arabi into the mainstream of Shi'ite thought. He wrote an
       enormous commentary on the Fosus, Nass al-nosus, the 500-page introduction of
       which has been published (representing about 10 percent of the text). Amoli
       investigates the meaning of the Fosus on three levels: naql (the Koran and Hadith,
       making special use here of Shi'ite sources), 'aql (meaning kalam and falsafa),
       and kashf (referring both to his own experience and the writings of major members
       of Ebn al-'Arabi's school). Amoli also wrote several Arabic works on metaphysics;
       especially significant is Jame' al-asrar (ed. Corbin and Yahia, Tehran, 1347 Sh./1969;
       see Morris, 106-08), which was written in his youth during his initial movement into
       Ebn al-'Arabi's universe.         Sa'en-al-Din 'Ali Torka Esfahani (d. 835/1432) completed a commentary on the
       Fosus in 831/1427; his treatise on wojud "being," Tamhid al-qawa'ed (ed. S. J.
       Ashtiani, Tehran, 1396/1976), frequently paraphrases Jandi's Fosus commentary. A
       number of Torka's Persian treatises (Ùahardah rasa'el, eds. S. 'A. Musawi
       Behbahani and S. E. Dibaji, Tehran, 1351 Sh./1972) make explicit or implicit
       reference to Ebn al-'Arabi's teachings. Molla Sadra (d. 1050/1641) frequently
       quotes at length from the Fotuhat in his Asfar. His student Molla Mohsen Fayd
       Kashani (d. 1090/1679) wrote an epitome of the Fotuhat and frequently quotes from
       Ebn al-'Arabi in his works (EI2 V, p. 476). Even Molla Mohammad-Baqer Majlesi
       (d. 1110/1669), well-known as a critic of Sufis in general and Ebn al-'Arabi in
       particular, quotes on occasion from Ebn al-'Arabi in his monumental Behar
       al-anwar (Beirut, 1983; e.g., ba'd ahl al-ma'refa in vol. 67, p. 339, refers to Ebn
       al-'Arabi in the Fotuhat, Cairo, 1911, vol. 2, p. 328.15). In the modern period,
       Ayat-Allah Khomeini differentiated himself from many other influential 'olama'
       by his intense interest in Ebn al-'Arabi (Knysh, 1992b).         The first of Ebn al-'Arabi's works to be translated into Persian was the Fosus, not
       as an independent work, but rather in the midst of the commentaries by Baba
       Rokn-al-Din and others. A translation without commentary was made by
       'Abd-al-Ghaffar b. Mohammad-'Ali; an autograph version, written in 1008/1685, is
       found in the Salar Jung Library in Hyderabad (Deccan) (Tasawwof 33; other
       copies are found in the Andhra Pradesh State Library, Tasawwof 464 and Jadid
       4248). Several short works by Ebn al-'Arabi on Sufi practice, including al-Anwar,
       Asrar al-khalwa, Haqiqat al-haqa'eq, and Helyat al-awlia' were translated in the
       8-9th/14-15th centuries (for the Persian text of these and other minor works, see
       Mayel Heravi, 1988). A manuscript (Andhra Pradesh, Jadid 1461) called Sharh-e
       Fotuhat, probably by Shaikh Mohebb-Allah Elahabadi, is the second volume (fols.
       357-747) of a work that includes translations of and commentary on long passages
       from the Fotuhat. Several of Elahabadi's long Persian works provide extensive
       translations from the Fotuhat.        Among Persian Sufis who were especially influential in the Arabic-speaking
       countries of Islam, one can mention 'Abd-al-Karim Jili (d. 832/1428), author of
       numerous independently-minded works, who settled in the Yemen and contributed to
       the widespread interest in Ebn al-'Arabi's writings there (see Knysh, 1992a).
       Finally, it is worth noting that most followers of Ebn al-'Arabi in Persia wrote their
       theoretical works in Arabic. In contrast, the Indian subcontinent witnessed an
       enormous outpouring of Persian writing pertaining to this school of thought, a
       legacy largely ignored by modern scholars, even in the subcontinent itself (Chittick,
       1992d).        Bibliography: (For cited works not given in detail, see "Short References.") The
       most comprehensive and best documented account of Ebn al-'Arabi's life is C.
       Addas, Ibn 'Arabi ou La quête du Soufre Rouge, Paris, 1989; tr. as Quest for the
       Red Sulphur, Cambridge, 1993. N. Z. Abu Zayd, Falsafat al-ta'wil, Cairo, 1983.
       H. Algar, "Reflections of Ibn 'Arabi in Early Naqshbandi Tradition," Journal of
       the Muhyiddin ibn 'Arabi Society 10, 1991, pp. 45-66. Sayyed Haydar Amoli,
       al-Moqaddemat men nass al-nosus, eds. H. Corbin and O. Yahia, Tehran, 1975. M.
       Asin Palacios, El Islam cristianizado, Madrid, 1931. S. J. Ashtiani, Sharh-e
       moqaddema-ye Qaysari bar Fosus al-hekam, Mashhad, 1385/1966. Idem, Rasa'el-e
       Qaysari, Mashhad, 1357 Sh./1978. A. Badawi, "Autobibliografía de Ibn 'Arabi,"
       al-Andalus 20, 1955, pp. 107-28. Awhad-al-Din Balyani, Épître sur l'uniciteÇ
       absolue, tr. M. Chodkiewicz, Paris, 1982. M. Bayrakdar, La philosophie mystique
       chez Dawud de Kayseri, Ankara, 1990. W. C. Chittick, "The Last Will and
       Testament of Ibn 'Arabi's Foremost Disciple and Some Notes on its Author,"
       Sophia Perennis 4/1, 1978, pp. 43-58. Idem, "The Perfect Man as the Prototype of
       the Self in the Sufism of Jami," Stud. Isl. 49, 1979, pp. 135-57. Idem, "The Five
       Divine Presences. From al-Qunawi to al-Qaysari," Muslim World 72, 1982a, pp.
       107-28. Idem, "Ibn 'Arabi's own Summary of the Fusus. 'The Imprint of the Bezels
       of Wisdom'," Journal of the Muhyiddin Ibn 'Arabi Society 1, 1982b, pp. 30-93.
       Idem, "The Chapter Headings of the Fusus," Journal of the Muhyiddin Ibn 'Arabi
       Society 2, 1984, pp. 41-94. Idem, The Sufi Path of Knowledge. Ibn al-'Arabi's
       Metaphysics of Imagination, Albany, 1989. Idem, "Ibn al-'Arabi and his School,"
       in Islamic Spirituality. Manifestations, ed. S. H. Nasr, New York, 1991, pp. 49-79.
       Idem, "The Circle of Spiritual Ascent According to al-Qunawi," Neoplatonism and
       Islamic Thought, ed. P. Morewedge, Albany, 1992a, pp. 179-209. Idem, Faith and
       Practice of Islam. Three Thirteenth Century Sufi Texts, Albany, 1992b. Idem,
       "Spectrums of Islamic Thought. Sa'id al-Din Farghani on the Implications of
       Oneness and Manyness," in The Legacy of Medieval Persian Sufism, ed. L.
       Lewisohn, London, 1992c, pp. 203-17. Idem, "Notes on Ibn al-'Arabi's Influence in
       India," Muslim World 82, 1992d, pp. 218-41. Idem, "Rumi and Wahdat al-Wujud,"
       in The Heritage of Rumi, ed. A. Banani and G. Sabagh, Cambridge, forthcoming.
       Idem and P. L. Wilson, Fakhruddin 'Iraqi. Divine Flashes, New York, 1982. M.
       Chodkiewicz, Le sceau des saints. Prophetie et sainteteÇ dans la doctrine d'Ibn
       Arabi, Paris, 1986; tr. as The Seal of the Saints, Cambridge, 1993. Idem, "The
       Diffusion of Ibn 'Arabi's Doctrine," Journal of the Muhyiddin Ibn 'Arabi Society
       9, 1991a, pp. 36-57. Idem, "The Futuhat Makkiya and its Commentators. Some
       Unresolved Enigmas," in The Legacy of Medieval Persian Sufism, ed. L. Lewisohn,
       London, 1991b, pp. 219-32. Idem, Un ocean sans rivage. Ibn 'Arabi, le Livre et la
       Loi, Paris, 1992; tr. as An Ocean without Shore, Albany, 1993. M. Chodkiewicz et
       al., Les Illuminations de la Mecque/The Meccan Illuminations. Textes
       choisis/Selected Texts, Paris, 1988. H. Corbin, Creative Imagination in the Sufism
       of Ibn 'Arabi, Princeton, 1969. Idem, En Islam iranien, III, Paris, 1973. Idem,
       Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth, Princeton, 1977. B. Foruzanfar, ed.,
       Manaqeb-e Awhad-al-Din ... Kermani, Tehran, 1347 Sh./1968. Y. Friedmann,
       Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi. An Outline of His Thought and a Study of His Image in
       the Eyes of Posterity, Montreal, 1971. S. Hakim, al-Mo'jam al-sufi, Beirut, 1981.
       N. L. Heer, The Precious Pearl. al-Jami's al-Durrat al-Fakhirah, Albany, 1979. S.
       Hirtenstein and M. Notcutt, eds., Muhyiddin Ibn 'Arabi. A Commemorative
       Volume, Shaftesbury, Dorset, 1993. T. Izutsu, Sufism and Taoism, Los Angeles,
       1983. M. Jahangiri, Mohyi-al-Din Ebn al-'Arabi, Tehran, 1361 Sh./1982.
       'Abd-al-Rahman Jami, Naqd al-nosus fi sharh Naqsh al-Fosus, ed. W. C. Chittick,
       Tehran, 1977. Idem, Lawa'eh, text and French tr. Y. Richard, Les jaillissements de
       lumieàre, Paris, 1982; text and English tr. E. H. Whinfield and M. M. Kazwini,
       London, 1906. A. Knysh, "Ibn 'Arabi in the Yemen. His Admirers and Detractors,"
       Journal of the Muhyiddin Ibn 'Arabi Society 11, 1992a, pp. 38-63. Idem, "Irfan
       Revisited. Khomeini and the Legacy of Islamic Mystical Philosophy," Middle East
       Journal 46, 1992b, pp. 631-53. H. Landolt, "Der Briefwechsel zwischen Kashani und
       Simnani über Wahdat al-Wugud," Der Islam 50, 1973, pp. 29-81. Idem, "Simnani
       on Wahdat al-Wojud," in Majmu'a-ye sokhanraniha wa maqalaha, ed. M.
       Mohaqqeq and H. Landolt, Tehran, 1971, pp. 91-111. L. Lewisohn, A Critical
       Edition of the Divan of Muhammad Shirin Maghribi, Tehran and London, 1993. P.
       Lory, Les Commentaires eÇsoteÇriques du Coran d'apreàs 'Abd al-Razzaq al-Qashani,
       Paris, 1981. N. Mayel Heravi, Rasa'el-e Ebn-e 'Arabi. Dah resala-ye farsi- shoda,
       Tehran, 1367 Sh./1988. A. Mir-'Abedini, Divan-e kamel-e Shams-e Maghrebi ... be
       endemam-e Resala-ye jam-e jahannoma, Tehran, 1358 Sh./1979. J. Morris, "Ibn
       'Arabi and his Interpreters. Part I: Recent French Translations," JAOS 106, 1986,
       pp. 539-51; "Part II. Influences and Interpretations," JAOS 106, 1986, pp. 733-56;
       107, 1987, pp. 101-19. S. Murata, The Tao of Islam. A Sourcebook on Gender
       Relationships in Islamic Thought, Albany, 1992. S. 'A. Musawi Behbahani,
       "Ahwal wa athar-e Sa'en-al-Din Torka Esfahani," in Majmu'a-ye sokhhanraniha wa
       maqalaha, ed. M. Mohaqqeq and H. Landolt, Tehran, 1971, pp. 97-145. S. Nafisi,
       Kolliyat-e 'Eraqi, Tehran, 1338 Sh./1959. I. R. Netton, Allah Transcendent. Studies
       in the Structure and Semiotics of Islamic Philosophy, Theology, and Cosmology,
       London, 1989. R. A. Nicholson, The tarjuman al-ashwaq. A Collection of Mystical
       Odes by Muhyi'ddin ibn al-'Arabi, London, 1911. H. S. Nyberg, Kleinere
       Schriften des Ibn al-'Arabi, Leiden, 1919. F. Rosenthal, "Ibn 'Arabi between
       'Philosophy' and 'Mysticism'," Oriens 31, 1988, pp. 1-35. A. Schimmel, Mystical
       Dimensions of Islam, Chapel Hill, 1975, pp. 263-86 and passim. M. Takeshita, Ibn
       'Arabi's Theory of the Perfect Man and its Place in the History of Islamic
       Thought, Tokyo, 1987. O. Yahia, Histoire et classification de l' oeuvre d'Ibn
       'Arabi, Damascus, 1964. Nezam-al-Din Yamani, Latáa'ef-e ashrafi, Delhi,
       1219/1804. 'A. Zarrinkub, Donbala-ye jostoju dar tasawwof-e irani, Tehran, 1362
       Sh./1983.         (WILLIAM C. CHITTICK)